On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 00:22 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > A few things that were discussed in the last round that I did *not* change: Thanks for this list btw. > - I did not add any locking around next_txq(); the driver is still supposed > to maintain a lock that prevents two threads from trying to schedule the > same AC at the same time. This is what drivers already do, so I figured it > was easier to just keep it that way rather than do it in mac80211. I'll look at this in the code, but from a maintainer perspective I'm somewhat worried that this will lead to issues that are really the driver's fault, but surface in mac80211. I don't know how easy it would be to catch that. Might be fine, but something to keep in mind. johannes
