> This stuff is very much hardware dependent, I don't deny that, but > still I would assume that the basic principles are almost the same. We > just need to come up with a good interface for the drivers. Sure, it's > more work now, but if we don't do it, PSM support will eventually get > really messy because all drivers do it somehow differently. I agree. > > I really don't know what other vendors do and user should not guess > > this. > > Yes, for the user this is too difficult, but I think the driver > shouldn't be making the decision either. So mac80211 stack would be > the most logical choice, and it could be make the decisions based on > user input (or something like that). Well, the user may want to make a choice based on the latency. Or, ideally, we would detect that they're using voice and want lower latency. Or something like that. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
