On Dienstag, 4. September 2018 14:07:54 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Dienstag, 4. September 2018 14:40:55 CEST Luca Coelho wrote: > > ) > > Sender: linux-wireless-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Precedence: bulk > > List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org> > > X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Looks like the SMTP headers are broken in all your patches. Here the > interesting part (as received by me): I meant mail headers. > [...] > X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on > > ) > Sender: linux-wireless-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Precedence: bulk > List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org> > X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx And just as additional info which I forgot: My mail setup is exim free. So they were not added by me. The only exim in the path seems to be: Received: from 91-156-4-241.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.156.4.241] helo=redipa.ger.corp.intel.com) by farmhouse.coelho.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <luca@xxxxxxxxx>) id 1fx9hf-00085m-4i; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:41:03 +0300 But as Johannes pointed out, they look fine on patch 1-3. [...] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on farmhouse.coelho.fi) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Kind regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.