On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:54 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Huh, why did you send this like 10 times? Also, HTML is dropped by the > list ... > Hi Johannes, There was an issue with our mailing server and we received Mail Delivery Failure notification. Hence, we tried multiple times by doing the changes. Apologies for the inconvenience. > > > I'm not convinced - why would you set that? It seems to me that drivers > > > might, for example, still do one band in hardware and the other in > > > software, or something like that? You might also run into the WARN_ON > > > here? > > > > If we don't set this bit, observed "scan aborted" when "iw dev wlan0 > > scan" command > > is given in redpine dual band modules(Didn't see any issue with single > > band module). > > sh# iw dev wlan0 scan > > scan aborted! > > What happened underneath here? I'm having a hard time understanding - > perhaps you can at least capture some mac80211 event tracing for this? > perhaps with function graph tracing too, so we see where exactly the > abort happens. > > Unless you already know why this happens, and that's why you set the > cancel bit? Sure Johannes. I will provide event trace or function graph details for this and send you the updatd patch. Is that fine?. > > So I think the clearer thing to do would be to have a separate bit for > this and check it in the right place. > > johannes Thanks Siva Rebbagondla
