On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 11:07 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > I do not think so since for nfrags we have: > nfrags = 1 + skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; > nfrags += 1 + skb_shinfo(head)->nr_frags; > > and even if frag_tail is NULL we will have nfrags = 2. > > Agree? Yeah, I misread those two lines. johannes