On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 01:56:47PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >> I think mt76xx_regs.h is named too generic. MT7603, MT7628, MT7615 and > >> all newer chips use a completely different register layout. > >> I'd prefer to stick with mt76x2_regs for now and use it for x0 as well. > > > > I thought about that too, but choose it will be better to have some > > prefix that will indicate the function/structure/header is shared between > > the x0 and x2 drivers to not confuse mt76x2 code that is mt76x2 only > > and one that is shared. > > > > I choose mt76xx name, considered mt76 to be generic prefix shared also > > between old and new chips. But yeah this mt76xx name also "contains" new > > chips. How about mt76old_ or mt76og_ (old generation) ? > I think this looks even more confusing. Also, please keep in mind that > 'old' is relative as well. > How about mt76x02? Ok to me. Stanislaw
