Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug 199967 - change WARN_ON(1) to IWL_ERR()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/18/2018 1:41 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:

On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 20:35 -0700, Nye Liu wrote:
The TX_STATUS_FAIL_DEST_PS case fills logs with full backtraces, which
are pretty useless. Just do IWL_ERR() printk.

Signed-off-by: Nye Liu <nyet@xxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
index cf2591f2ac23..87044953e6b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
@@ -1407,8 +1407,10 @@ static void iwl_mvm_rx_tx_cmd_single(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
  			/* the FW should have stopped the queue and not
  			 * return this status
  			 */
-			WARN_ON(1);
  			info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_TX_FILTERED;
+			IWL_ERR(mvm, "TX_STATUS_FAIL_DEST_PS: "
+				"tid %d, status %x, flags %x\n", tid, status,
+				info->flags);
  			break;
  		default:
  			break;
I think this error is serious enough and we would like to catch it when
it occurs so we can debug the actual cause.

But I agree that we shouldn't be repeating it millions of times.  What
about just changing it to WARN_ON_ONCE() instead?

That would be fine, but IMO the WARN_ON() provides less information that the printk(). I'm not an IWL devel but there is limited information on the wifi state itself in the WARN() - just call stack and register information. Also, with WARN_ON_ONCE() the frequency of the error is masked.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux