Thanks Brian for the review.
On 2018-08-14 01:36, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi Govind,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:04:28PM +0530, Govind Singh wrote:
Add WCN3990 QMI client handshakes for Q6 integrated WLAN connectivity
subsystem. This layer is responsible for communicating qmi control
messages to wifi fw QMI service using QMI messaging protocol.
Qualcomm MSM Interface(QMI) is a messaging format used to communicate
between components running between remote processors with underlying
transport layer based on integrated chipset(shared memory) or
discrete chipset(PCI/USB/SDIO/UART).
Signed-off-by: Govind Singh <govinds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 2 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c | 1019
++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h | 129 +++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 262 +++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.h | 4 +
8 files changed, 1417 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.h
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d91499a7354c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1019 @@
...
+int ath10k_qmi_deinit(struct ath10k *ar)
+{
+ struct ath10k_snoc *ar_snoc = ath10k_snoc_priv(ar);
+ struct ath10k_qmi *qmi = ar_snoc->qmi;
+
+ cancel_work_sync(&qmi->event_work);
+ destroy_workqueue(qmi->event_wq);
I believe this is incorrect ordering. You should not be destroying the
work queue that handles QMI event responses before you release the QMI
handle. As it stands, this means you segfault during 'rmmod'.
Yes, correct. I will correct this in v5 as this is still not merged in
ath10k-next.
+ qmi_handle_release(&qmi->qmi_hdl);
I think this should be:
qmi_handle_release(&qmi->qmi_hdl);
cancel_work_sync(&qmi->event_work);
destroy_workqueue(qmi->event_wq);
+ qmi = NULL;
This assignment is pointless, as 'qmi' is a local variable. Maybe you
meant to clear the struct member, as a precaution? So this would be:
ar_snoc->qmi = NULL;
Yes, i will correct this in v5.
Brian
+
+ return 0;
+}
Thanks,
Govind
