Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:41:28AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> I thought SPDX line is needed only if file has no license and eeprom.c >> >> file and other mt76x0 files have specified the license. Is SPDX still >> >> needed in that case ? >> >> I thought all source files needed SPDX: https://lwn.net/Articles/739183/ > > Ok, goal is to have all kernel source files with SPDX header. Yeah, it's a goal but I don't think it's a hard requirement yet. At least I don't see it as a reason to reject patches. And besides, mt76 uses ISC license and that's not in LICENSES directory. So someone should add that first, and I think that patch should go via Jonathan Corbet's tree (CCed). -- Kalle Valo
