On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 23:03 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Holger Schurig >> <hs4233@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Fixing unaligned memory access on the blackfin architecture >> >> (maybe on the ARM also). >> > >> > You can delete the "maybe", on ARM (more specificially, on a >> > PXA255, which is ARMv5TE) I didn't had a problem. >> >> Ok, just blackfin. Is it a joke or should I resend the patch with >> another description?.. > > I'm sure arm has that problem too and sparc and others, but it may not > always show up because the frame might actually be aligned sometimes. > > OTOH, why are you getting unaligned frames in the first place? This is > the beacon interval, so it's at a fixed modulo-two position from the > start of the frame. Do you mean that we should add __attribute__ ((aligned (2))) for our 'bss_descriptor' structure definition rather align particular fields at runtime? > > johannes > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
