Ivo van Doorn wrote:
...
Yes, but if you look again you see that the legacy driver does
define it, and even includes the description of bits 9 -> 19 And
the legacy driver source code has always been more reliable then
the datasheet, so I would put my money on the code. ;)
I know. But I suspect that in this case, the datasheet just *may* be
correct.
Would it be possible to verify with Ralink that this is not a
typo in the RT2500 datasheet?
I'll see what I can find out.
Thanks,
--
Bryan
-
"Beyond the point of no return, there's no going back."
Narration to "Mars Rising" on the Science Channel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
