On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:36 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > True, I have to double check it, but the legacy drivers use per-queue locking as well. > > And it would still be possible for the driver to send out frames with a higher > > sequence number before one with a lower number. > > The legacy drivers hopefully also implement proper sequence numbering > per TID. I'll send another mail on the topic. Heh, I seriously doubt that. As far as I know it is working using a single counter in the main interface structure. Just the same way it currently works in mac80211 (which isn't surprising, since I based the mac80211 patch on the legacy driver implementation). > > But I'll put out a request on the rt2400-devel list to see if anybody is interested > > in looking into this issue for rt2400pci and rt2500pci. In if there is nobody, I'll > > disable adhoc and master mode for those drivers to prevent problems. > > Heh, that works. Just disable it and tell folks who want it to work to > fix it :) Well I am putting out an in advance notice first. ;) Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
