On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 16:04 -0700, peter.oh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Peter Oh <peter.oh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> NL80211_ATTR_OFFCHANNEL_TX_OK does not mean given channel is always
> off channel, but it means the channel given could be off channel.
> Hence it should not block the given channel to be used if given
> channel does not require off channel mgmt tx although regulatory
> domain is non-ETSI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oh <peter.oh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/wireless/nl80211.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> index 4eece06..991042b 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> @@ -9915,7 +9915,9 @@ static int nl80211_tx_mgmt(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> wdev_lock(wdev);
> - if (params.offchan && !cfg80211_off_channel_oper_allowed(wdev)) {
> + if (params.offchan &&
> + !cfg80211_chandef_identical(&chandef, &wdev->chandef) &&
> + !cfg80211_off_channel_oper_allowed(wdev)) {
> wdev_unlock(wdev);
Hmm. That seems fine, but can we be sure that wdev->chandef is always
valid? ISTR that it isn't necessarily updated all the time, but I can't
really say right now.
johannes
