Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 16:31 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Since (QoS) NDP frames shouldn't be put into aggregation nor are >> > assigned real sequence numbers, etc. it's better to treat them as >> > non-data packets and not put them on the normal TXQs, for example >> > when building A-MPDUs they need to be treated specially, and they >> > are more used for management (e.g. to see if the station is alive) >> > anyway. >> >> No objections to this per se; > > :-) > >> but didn't we want to move towards >> everything going through the TXQs? Any progress on that front? :) > > Not really. Yes, I wanted to, but it's some massive surgery. Right now > I'm working on converting iwlwifi, perhaps I'll learn about it more > and can then do the mac80211 surgery better later. Right, sounds good! Looking forward to the iwlwifi conversion :) -Toke
