Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: use IDA to allocate wiphy indeces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/29/2018 11:48 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi Johannes,

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:42:20AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 18:29 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
It's annoying to see the phy index increase arbitrarily, just because a
device got removed and re-probed (e.g., during a device reset, or due to
probe testing). We can use the in-kernel index allocator for this,
instead of just an increasing counter.

I can understand that it's somewhat annoying to people, but it was
actually done on purpose to avoid userspace talking to the wrong device.

Hmm, interesting. I'm not dead-set on this patch, so if there are good
reasons to reject it, I won't fret.

Imagine you have some userspace process running that has remembered the
wiphy index to use it to talk to nl80211, and now underneath the device
goes away and reappears. This process should understand that situation,
and handle it accordingly, rather than being blind to the reset.

How is this different from the wlan (netdev) device naming? We allow
'wlan0' to leave and return under the same name. Isn't the right answer
that user space should be listening for udev and/or netlink events?

Brian


For what it is worth, we use udev to rename the phyX to wiphyZ devices based on
their MAC address, and that seems to work OK.

I can't think of any reason why user-space would need the phy index number
to increase as modules are loaded/unloaded though.

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux