On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 16:15 +0530, Tamizh chelvam wrote:
> Add cfg80211_sta_mon_rssi_notify api to update user space upon
> crossing the configured rssi threshold of a station.
> NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_STA_MON introduced to send this event to
> userspace along with NL80211_ATTR_STA_MON_RSSI_THRESHOLD_EVENT,
> NL80211_ATTR_MAC and NL80211_ATTR_STA_MON_RSSI_LEVEL info.
> Userspace application can make a decision depends on this
> notification.
I guess you should also combine this with patch 2, it's a bit weird to
only have one side and not be able to use it in one patch, and both
aren't all that big.
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,7 @@ enum nl80211_commands {
> NL80211_CMD_CONTROL_PORT_FRAME,
>
> NL80211_CMD_SET_STA_MON,
> + NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_STA_MON,
Missing documentation - but again, why not unify it with the existing
event? Or can't we because that might confuse older applications?
Perhaps anyway we should unicast these notifications? Not sure though,
perhaps one app could set them up and the other might care?
> +static struct sk_buff *cfg80211_prepare_sta_mon(struct net_device *dev,
> + const char *mac, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
> + struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = wiphy_to_rdev(wdev->wiphy);
> + struct sk_buff *msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, gfp);
> + void **cb;
> +
> + if (!msg)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + cb = (void **)msg->cb;
Uh, what's that? Please use a structure.
> + cb[0] = nl80211hdr_put(msg, 0, 0, 0, NL80211_CMD_NOTIFY_STA_MON);
>
[...]
> +
> + cb[1] = nla_nest_start(msg, NL80211_ATTR_STA_MON);
> + if (!cb[1])
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + cb[2] = rdev;
Yeah, definitely use a struct instead of three magic array indices.
> +
> + msg = cfg80211_prepare_sta_mon(dev, peer, gfp);
> + if (!msg)
> + return;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, NL80211_ATTR_STA_MON_RSSI_THRESHOLD_EVENT,
> + rssi_event))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + if (rssi_level && nla_put_s32(msg, NL80211_ATTR_STA_MON_RSSI_LEVEL,
> + rssi_level))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + cfg80211_send_sta_mon(msg, gfp);
In fact, perhaps better to have something like
struct nl80211_sta_mon_prep {
struct sk_buff *skb;
....
};
struct nl80211_sta_mon_prep prep;
if (cfg80211_prepare_sta_mon(&prep))
return;
...
cfg80211_send_sta_mon(&prep, gfp);
or so?
johannes
