On 2018-06-19 22:01, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 6/19/2018 5:48 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
After a bit long discussions in various e-mail threads I'm coming with
this simple & small patchset. It isn't complete support for monitor
mode
but just a pair of preparing patches that should be clear & well
discussed by now to make them acceptable.
The main missing bit is code setting MONITOR_FMT_RADIOTAP which I
expect
Arend to handle soon, as he already has a patch using "sta_monitor"
iovar for that. Then we have to discuss a flag for marking firmwares
which are capable for tagging monitor frames.
While still incomplete, I believe that with my previous patches, we
can
agree this is a good direction.
Arend: if you find these 2 patches OK, could you ack them, to make it
clear for Kalle if they look OK now (or not yet)? I'd be great if you
could sent your "sta_monitor" work on top of this.
I acked them and I will submit my changes later. Either after these
are applied or simply indicate the dependency.
Now as for where we are with this. With what we have here we know
firmware can monitor packets with and without radiotap. However, we do
not have an indication whether firmware can transport these monitor
packets to the host. What I need to look into next is whether the
802.11 flag in msgbuf is linked to a particular version of the
protocol, but we may need to resort to the fwid table.
Being able to detect if firmware tags monitor packets would be great.
Please let us know if you find anything and thanks a lot for looking at
this patchset!
