On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 12:48, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/30/2018 1:52 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > I'm providing extra version info of tested firmware images as requested > > by Arend in another e-mail thread. > > Looking into our firmware repo it there are two flags, ie. WL_MONITOR > and WL_RADIOTAP. It seems both are set for firmware containing -stamon- > feature. Your list below confirms that. I still plan to add indication > for WL_RADIOTAP in the "cap" iovar, but a stamon feature check could be > used for older firmwares. The problem is that there isn't a direct mapping between what's visible with the "tail" command and what firmware returns for the "cap" iovar. Just to be sure I bumped #define MAX_CAPS_BUFFER_SIZE to 1024. Firmware that has "stamon" when checked with "tail" command doesn't report "stamon" over "cap" iovar. So I can't detect if firmware was compiled with WL_MONITOR and WL_RADIOTAP using "cap" iovar.
