On 05/25/2018 08:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
index 2ba8cf3..29e32cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
@@ -3898,17 +3898,17 @@ int ath6kl_cfg80211_init(struct ath6kl *ar)
wiphy->max_scan_ie_len = 1000; /* FIX: what is correct limit? */
switch (ar->hw.cap) {
case WMI_11AN_CAP:
- ht = true;
+ ht = true; /* fall through */
case WMI_11A_CAP:
band_5gig = true;
break;
case WMI_11GN_CAP:
- ht = true;
+ ht = true; /* fall through */
case WMI_11G_CAP:
band_2gig = true;
break;
case WMI_11AGN_CAP:
- ht = true;
+ ht = true; /* fall through */
case WMI_11AG_CAP:
band_2gig = true;
band_5gig = true;
Hm, typically such comments are done on a line of their own, have
never seen this style...
Yeah, I was wondering the same. Was there a particular reason for this?
Sometimes people use this style for a one-line code block.
I can change it to the traditional style. No problem.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
