On Sat, 12 May 2018 12:00:07 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, I'm OK with the patch, if we have a third patch that cleans up the > > PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY dependency by moving it to SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE > > where it belongs. (This doesn't need to go into the stable tree.) > > We currently implicitly get that via dependency chain, so this is OK > > for now as-is. > > I'm planning to handle PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY cleanup once my patches hit > net-next.git and then wireless-drivers-next.git. It's to avoid > conflicts. Yes, thanks. Take your time. We're not in a hurry. :) This change should not make a functional difference. -- Michael
Attachment:
pgpnbSNyClI0x.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
