> We have to improve more places in allocation and we hopefully had
> mapped all of them.
> This patch fixes allocation that was in order 5 in( (ATOMCI | DMA) and
> was most urgent.
> The section you've suggested is I think on 3rd or 4th place. Don't
> worry we get there.
> What is more important now that we get some feedback on this fix.
Fair enough. I can't really comment on that patch. You might want to
have somebody do some spring cleaning in iwlwifi, I just found this
comment I inserted there during some refactoring:
4150c572 (Johannes Berg 2007-09-17 01:29:23 -0400 6941) /*
4150c572 (Johannes Berg 2007-09-17 01:29:23 -0400 6942) * very dubious code was here; the probe filtering flag is never set:
4150c572 (Johannes Berg 2007-09-17 01:29:23 -0400 6943) *
b481de9c (Zhu Yi 2007-09-25 17:54:57 -0700 6944) if (unlikely(test_bit(STATUS_SCANNING, &priv->status)) &&
b481de9c (Zhu Yi 2007-09-25 17:54:57 -0700 6945) !(priv->hw->flags & IEEE80211_HW_NO_PROBE_FILTERING)) {
4150c572 (Johannes Berg 2007-09-17 01:29:23 -0400 6946) */
:)
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
