On Friday 04 July 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > I just received an answer from Ralink about this issue, > > Cool. > > > 1. For 11b/g based chips rt2500, rt2570, rt61, rt73 doesn't implement this. > > Oh, too bad. > > > 2. For 11n based chips, there is one MAC register have to enable to have this feature. > > But, Word 2 of RXWI will put the timestamp and the RSSI will put to Word 3. > > The original Word 3 SNR will disappear and replace by RSSI. > > Nice. > > > As for the timestamps in 2400 and rt2800, they are both in 32bits, so I am not sure how > > reliable they will be for IBSS. > > Well 32-bits is plenty if you can also read the TSF to extend it to 64, > b43 only gets 16 by the firmware and we just extend it on packet RX. Ok, I'll update rt2x00 so rt2400pci can already start reporting the timestamp, I assume the timestamp reporting is more important then reporting the SNR, because apparenly for rt2800 we can only get one of those. :S Ivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
