On 23 April 2018 at 08:50, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adrian was also commenting something similar about adding a debugfs
> interface but I don't really see the point right now while we are adding
> initial wcn3990 support. If someone wants to run measurements with and
> without this parameter it's very easy to edit it out from the sources.
> Later on we can consider making it dynamic if there's really the need
> for that, but I'm very skeptic that anyone would even need that.
Hi!
We have at ${WORK}, because we've found various devices (atheros and
qualcomm and QCA and otherwise) have this nasty habit of trying to
guess when a good time to clock-gate down is, but we're busy doing low
latency audio/video.
10, 20ms may not be a lot of latency for bulk data but that's a half
to one of a video frame in my world. :-)
-adrian
