On Thursday 03 July 2008 18:30:18 Felipe Maya wrote:
> Hi, I have applied this patch and i tested on a wl500gpv2 (BCM5354). The
> following part disable the ethernet device. If this part of the patch is
> restored the device work ok.
Well, I would say your architecture is pretty broken then.
This patch replaces an incorrect manual DMA mask setting by
a call to the official API.
Please report this to your archtitecture maintainer.
> > -int ssb_dma_set_mask(struct ssb_device *ssb_dev, u64 mask)
> > +int ssb_dma_set_mask(struct ssb_device *dev, u64 mask)
> > {
> > - struct device *dma_dev = ssb_dev->dma_dev;
> > - int err = 0;
> > + int err;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST
> > - if (ssb_dev->bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI) {
> > - err = pci_set_dma_mask(ssb_dev->bus->host_pci, mask);
> > + switch (dev->bus->bustype) {
> > + case SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI:
> > + err = pci_set_dma_mask(dev->bus->host_pci, mask);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> > - err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ssb_dev->bus->host_pci, mask);
> > + err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(dev->bus->host_pci, mask);
> > return err;
> > + case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
> > + return dma_set_mask(dev->dev, mask);
> > + default:
> > + __ssb_dma_not_implemented(dev);
> > }
> > -#endif
> > - dma_dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask;
> > - dma_dev->dma_mask = &dma_dev->coherent_dma_mask;
> > -
> > - return err;
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssb_dma_set_mask);
>
>
>
>
--
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
