Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/2] rfkill: ignore errors from rfkill_toggle_radio in rfkill_add_switch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> rfkill_add_switch() calls rfkill_toggle_radio() to set the state of a
> recently registered rfkill class to the current global state [for that
> rfkill->type].
>
> The rfkill_toggle_radio() call is going to error out if the hardware is
> RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED, and the global state is RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED.
>
> That is a quite normal situation which I missed to account for.  As things
> stand, the error return from rfkill_toggle_radio ends up causing
> rfkill_register to bail out with an error (de-registering the new switch in
> the process), which is Not Nice.
>
> Change rfkill_add_switch() to not return errors because of a failed call to
> rfkill_toggle_radio().  We can go back to returning errors again (if that's
> indeed the right thing to do) if we define the exact error codes the
> rfkill->toggle_radio callbacks are to return in each situation, so that we
> can ignore the right ones only.
>
> Bug reported by "kionez <kionez@xxxxxxxx>".
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: kionez <kionez@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/rfkill/rfkill.c |   10 ++++------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> index aa7039d..7a560b7 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> @@ -501,17 +501,15 @@ static struct class rfkill_class = {
>
>  static int rfkill_add_switch(struct rfkill *rfkill)
>  {
> -       int error;
> -
>        mutex_lock(&rfkill_mutex);
>
> -       error = rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill, rfkill_states[rfkill->type], 0);
> -       if (!error)
> -               list_add_tail(&rfkill->node, &rfkill_list);
> +       rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill, rfkill_states[rfkill->type], 0);
> +
> +       list_add_tail(&rfkill->node, &rfkill_list);
>
>        mutex_unlock(&rfkill_mutex);
>
> -       return error;
> +       return 0;
>  }

So why this is not a void function
Thanks
Tomas
>  static void rfkill_remove_switch(struct rfkill *rfkill)
> --
> 1.5.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux