On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rfkill_add_switch() calls rfkill_toggle_radio() to set the state of a > recently registered rfkill class to the current global state [for that > rfkill->type]. > > The rfkill_toggle_radio() call is going to error out if the hardware is > RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED, and the global state is RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED. > > That is a quite normal situation which I missed to account for. As things > stand, the error return from rfkill_toggle_radio ends up causing > rfkill_register to bail out with an error (de-registering the new switch in > the process), which is Not Nice. > > Change rfkill_add_switch() to not return errors because of a failed call to > rfkill_toggle_radio(). We can go back to returning errors again (if that's > indeed the right thing to do) if we define the exact error codes the > rfkill->toggle_radio callbacks are to return in each situation, so that we > can ignore the right ones only. > > Bug reported by "kionez <kionez@xxxxxxxx>". > > Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: kionez <kionez@xxxxxxxx> > --- > net/rfkill/rfkill.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c > index aa7039d..7a560b7 100644 > --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c > +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c > @@ -501,17 +501,15 @@ static struct class rfkill_class = { > > static int rfkill_add_switch(struct rfkill *rfkill) > { > - int error; > - > mutex_lock(&rfkill_mutex); > > - error = rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill, rfkill_states[rfkill->type], 0); > - if (!error) > - list_add_tail(&rfkill->node, &rfkill_list); > + rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill, rfkill_states[rfkill->type], 0); > + > + list_add_tail(&rfkill->node, &rfkill_list); > > mutex_unlock(&rfkill_mutex); > > - return error; > + return 0; > } So why this is not a void function Thanks Tomas > static void rfkill_remove_switch(struct rfkill *rfkill) > -- > 1.5.5.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html