Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Use the new ether_broadcast_addr global instead to save some object code. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/admtek/adm8211.c | 3 +-- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/mac.c | 4 +--- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/main.c | 3 +-- > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 3 +-- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c | 6 +----- > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/main.c | 5 +---- > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 5 +---- > 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) It would be really helpful if you could CLEARLY document in the patches (or in the cover letter but then you need to cc all parties) to what tree the patches are meant for. Otherwise I, and other maintainers as well, need to waste time trying to guess what's your plan. I will now drop the four wireless patches from my queue. So if you want to me to take them please resubmit. -- Kalle Valo
