On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > > print_symbol() removal. > > > > This now avoids any possible printk interleaving. > > > > Unfortunately, without some #ifdef in vsprintf, which > > I would like to avoid, it increases the nommu kernel > > size by ~500 bytes. > > > > Anyone think this is acceptable? [] > This doesn't feel like a huge win since it's only called ~once per > architecture. I'd be more excited if it made the printing of the whole > thing standardised; eg we have a print_fault() function in mm/memory.c > which takes a suitable set of arguments. Sure but perhaps that's not feasible as the surrounding output is per-arch specific. What could be a standardized fault message here?
