On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 18:05, Stephen Hemminger [...] > > ebtables is your friend in dealing with weird and broken devices. > > It may be weird, not sure if actually broken. Anyway I'd like to have > some generic solution instead of telling every user to use ebtables to > workaround the problem. I agree that a "broken by default" in OpenWRT/LEDE for a variety of Broadcom devices is not really acceptable. Technically we could teach netifd in OpenWRT/LEDE to configure ebtables accordingly, at least for a list of affected devices, so that users would not have to. However, as ebtables is not managed by the fw3 in OpenWRT/LEDE, that would probably interfer with user provided ebtables rules and scripts... > That said I think we still should look for a solution for existing > firmwares. I guess it may takes months to years to never to release > new firmwares for all supported chipsets. Hm, we could change the default in OpenWRT/LEDE for multicast-to-unicast (or more precisely bridge hairpinning) to disabled again for now.