On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > THIS is very interesting alright... and it is *extremely* important, so > > let's triple verify it, shall we? > > > > Please hack the driver to try to transmit data with that bit set to high, and > > also with that bit set to low. The best way to go about it is probably to > > disable the rfkill support (so that it doesn't get in the way), hack the > > check-the-bit function to just printk its state, and see if the radio can > > effectively transmit and communicate no matter what state the input pin is > > at. > > > > This is very important. It will caracterize that input pin as either an > > hardware rfkill line, or as an input device (in which case I would be wrong > > when I asked to remove the input support from b43, but one step at a time). > > Sorry, no, I think I got confused, it should be a hardware rfkill line. I'd like to have a certain response for this. Can you test, and assert whether it is a rfkill line or not? And, if it IS a rfkill line, I still need to know if it is flip-flop-like or not... I am not certain I got the right idea (I understood it was NOT flip-flop-like). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html