Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] ssb:: use put_device() if device_register fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 07 March 2018 10:17 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Wed,  7 Mar 2018 15:31:30 +0530
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

if device_register() returned an error! Always use put_device()
to give up the reference initialized.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ssb/main.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
index 65420a9..c4449e0 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
@@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ static int ssb_devices_register(struct ssb_bus *bus)
  			ssb_err("Could not register %s\n", dev_name(dev));
  			/* Set dev to NULL to not unregister
  			 * dev on error unwinding. */
+			put_device(dev);
  			sdev->dev = NULL;
  			kfree(devwrap);
  			goto error;

I don't think this is correct.
The dev structure is allocated as part of devwrap, which is freed here.

Why do you think we need put_device here?

Yes this patch is not correct, We must not use kfree() after you called device_register() (even
if it was not successful!) -- see the comment for device_register().
I will delete kfree() and send updated patch.

~arvind



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux