Am 22.02.2018 um 23:17 schrieb Steve deRosier:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:15 AM, <s.gottschall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Adds LED and GPIO Control support for 988x, 9887, 9888, 99x0, 9984 based chipsets with on chipset connected led's
using WMI Firmware API.
The LED device will get available named as "ath10k-phyX" at sysfs and can be controlled with various triggers.
adds also debugfs interface for gpio control.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@xxxxxxxxxx>
v2 add correct gpio count per chipset and remove IPQ4019 support since this chipset does not make use of specific gpios)
v5 fix compiling without LED_CLASS and GPIOLIB support, fix also error by kbuild test robot which does not occur in standard builds. curious
v6 correct return values and fix comment style
v7 fix ath10k_unregister_led for compiling without LED_CLASS
v8 fix various code design issues reported by reviewers
v9 move led and led code to separate sourcefile (gpio.c)
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 28 ++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 33 ++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/debug.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/gpio.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h | 2 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 5 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-ops.h | 36 +++++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c | 65 ++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 46 +++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 36 ++++++
12 files changed, 590 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/gpio.c
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
index deb5ae21a559..c46b7658a820 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ config ATH10K
tristate "Atheros 802.11ac wireless cards support"
depends on MAC80211 && HAS_DMA
select ATH_COMMON
+ select MAC80211_LEDS
+ select LEDS_CLASS
+ select NEW_LEDS
select CRC32
select WANT_DEV_COREDUMP
---help---
Pure question: do we require LEDS, or is this an option? I assumed all
along it was an optional thing - ie if GPIOs and/or LEDs were
configured, we added this code. And if not optional, then what happens
if we are on a platform that can't support LEDS_CLASS or NEW_LEDS,
assuming there is such a thing?
i took this behaviour from ath9k/ath5k, both driver auto select
MAC80211_LEDS and LEDS_CLASS (by the way MAC80211_LEDS auto selects
LEDS_CLASS too). only chipsets which are known to have preconfigured
leds are used
and led will only turn on if you enable it in sysfs by assigning a
trigger to the led.
for sure this can be removed from the Kconfig. it will compile without
it as well. so this is optional. i just added it since all other drivers
behave in the same way.
in addition. LEDS_CLASS / NEW_LEDS is a kernel api, not a driver. so
all platforms to support LEDS_CLASS. just enabling LEDS_CLASS will not
cause any platform specific dependency.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile
index 6739ac26fd29..bcb234f0b940 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Makefile
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_NL80211_TESTMODE) += testmode.o
ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_ATH10K_TRACING) += trace.o
ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_THERMAL) += thermal.o
ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS) += debugfs_sta.o
+ath10k_core-y += gpio.o
ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_PM) += wow.o
ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += coredump.o
I'd expect it would be something like `ath10k_core-$(CONFIG_GPIO) +=
gpoi.o`. Maybe I'm mistaken.
gpio.c contains the MAC80211_LEDS code and has a guard for GPIOLIB
inside. it can be compiled even if GPIOLIB is disabled in system. (which
is indeed platform specific)
and leds are still supported without gpio support since it does contain
a led only driver and a separate gpio driver.
i suggest more somelike like
ath10k_core-$(ATH10K_LEDS) += gpio.o
if you want it totally optional which requires some other small changes as well (mainly renaming some ifdefs)
(Note, I didn't look up the actual config option name, I'm guessing.
Assume I wrote something reasonable for my example.)
I only ask the above two questions, not because I think it's wrong,
but because I don't quite know the intention and it makes me wonder.
Other than those questions, which are optional as the code looks
correct to me, the rest of it looks fine to me.
i fully understand your concerns, i just followed other drivers
behaviour. for sure its more sane to make it optional and to compile it
out of not required.
but then i suggest todo the same in ath5k and ath9k
Reviewed-by: Steve deRosier <derosier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Steve
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Regards
Sebastian Gottschall / CTO
NewMedia-NET GmbH - DD-WRT
Firmensitz: Stubenwaldallee 21a, 64625 Bensheim
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 25473
Geschäftsführer: Peter Steinhäuser, Christian Scheele
http://www.dd-wrt.com
email: s.gottschall@xxxxxxxxxx
Tel.: +496251-582650 / Fax: +496251-5826565
