On 1/31/2018 2:11 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
void brcmf_netif_rx(struct brcmf_if *ifp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ if (!brcmf_is_valid_skb(skb)) {
+ brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(skb);
Maybe we should add a driver stat for this although I better have a
look into the root cause of this.
It seems there are following stats fields we can use:
1) rx_errors
2) rx_dropped
3) rx_length_errors
4) rx_over_errors
5) rx_crc_errors
6) rx_frame_errors
7) rx_fifo_errors
8) rx_missed_errors
Which one do you think may fit this case the best?
Those are actually netdev stats, right? Not sure I want to have those,
but if any I would say 3) fits best.
Regards,
Arend
