Hi Brian, > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Norris [mailto:briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 12:04 AM > To: Ganapathi Bhat > Cc: Kalle Valo; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cathy Luo; Xinming Hu; > Zhiyuan Yang; James Cao; Mangesh Malusare; Shrenik Shikhare > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [2/2] mwifiex: use more_rx_task_flag to avoid USB RX > stall > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:59:04AM +0000, Ganapathi Bhat wrote: > > > I can't find any commit with id c7dbdcb2a4e1, is it correct? > > Correct. Actually the commit id c7dbdcb2a4e1 is the PATCH [1/2] sent in this > series. > > What? Why would you introduce a bug and only fix it in the next patch? With the first patch the original issue took considerably longer time to recreate. Also it followed a different path to get recreated(shared in commit message). > Does that mean you should just combine the two? Let us know if that is fine to merge them. We can modify the commit message accordingly. > Or reverse the order, if patch 2 doesn't cause problems on its own? Patch 2 has a dependency on patch 1. > > Brian Regards, Ganapathi
