On 01/26/2018 01:46 AM, pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> Add rf mask definition (BIT 0, BIT 1, BIT 2, ...) that is different from rf path definition (0, 1, 2, ...), and then combinations of rf path are possible. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I agree that an rf path mask is useful. Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h index 4de2ab1d5416..2e9a20273a2d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ enum radio_path { RF90_PATH_D = 3, };+enum radio_mask {+ RF_MASK_A = BIT(0), + RF_MASK_B = BIT(1), + RF_MASK_C = BIT(2), + RF_MASK_D = BIT(3), +}; + enum regulation_txpwr_lmt { TXPWR_LMT_FCC = 0, TXPWR_LMT_MKK = 1, @@ -579,6 +586,7 @@ enum ht_channel_width { HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20 = 0, HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20_40 = 1, HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80 = 2, + HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_MAX, };/* Ref: 802.11i sepc D10.0 7.3.2.25.1
