Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 01/08/2018 10:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler >>> nor holding a spinlock. >>> The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> You submitted an identical patch a week earlier: >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10137671/ >> >> How is this different? Also always add version number to the patch so that the >> maintainers can follow the changes easily: >> >> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#patch_version_missing >> >> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#changelog_missing > > I had negative comments on one of those due to the possibility of > msleep(2) extending as long as 20 msec. Until the author, or someone > else, can test that this is OK, then the mdelay(2) can only be > replaced with usleep_range(2000, 3000). > > NACK for both. Ok, patches dropped. -- Kalle Valo
