Luca Coelho <luca@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch introduces a new instance of rate_control_ops for
> the new API (adding only empty stubs here and the subsequent
> patches in the series will fill in the implementation).
> The decision which API to use is done during the register
> step according to FW TLV.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> +void iwl_mvm_rs_add_sta(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta)
> +{
> + struct iwl_lq_sta_rs_fw *lq_sta = &mvmsta->lq_sta.rs_fw;
> +
> + IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "create station rate scale window\n");
> +
> + lq_sta->pers.drv = mvm;
> + lq_sta->pers.sta_id = mvmsta->sta_id;
> + lq_sta->pers.chains = 0;
> + memset(lq_sta->pers.chain_signal, 0, sizeof(lq_sta->pers.chain_signal));
> + lq_sta->pers.last_rssi = S8_MIN;
> + lq_sta->last_rate_n_flags = 0;
> +
> +#ifdef CPTCFG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS
> + lq_sta->pers.dbg_fixed_rate = 0;
> +#endif
> +}
CPTCFG_ doesn't look right. But no need to resend just because of this,
you can send a followup patch.
--
Kalle Valo
