Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:54 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> But since we'll have to do that for ath9k anyway it >> becomes more a question of whether it's something that should be >> supported in mac80211 or if it should be implemented in each driver. >> But since that logic will have to be written from scratch anyway, is >> there any reason to not just do it in mac80211 from the beginning? > > I was thinking in the driver so that there's no overhead for the other > drivers that don't want it that way. > > Dunno. It probably doesn't really matter. I'll prototype something, then we can revisit this based on actual code :) -Toke
