On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 13:33 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > Do I understand correctly that it might be better to check for the > existence of endpoint 02 for an 8187 device? Or would it be better to > look for endpoint 12 to set it as an 8187B? It's probably OK either way, but I would look at some number that takes more than just 2 values (true and false). Say, the number of endpoints would be such number. This way, it there is some elusive 8187A or 8187C, it may have a different number and won't be mistaken for known chipsets. Of course, we cannot guarantee anything. It's just a matter of general sanity that may or may not help. But sometimes it helps. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
