> > My assumption is that by default all the patches should cleanly apply > > to wireless-drivers-next. I could apply the patch in question to > > wireless-drivers-next without any issues. > > Odd. How did you apply it? My script uses 'git am -s -3' individually > for each patch in the series, but to my knowledge that shouldn't cause > any problems. It turns out I mechanically rebased my branch on top of w-d-n before writing the previous email. Now I could reproduce the same failure when using this command for the original patches downloaded from patchwork. The problem was in conflict with qtnfmac fixes pulled to w-d-n from w-d. Regards, Sergey