Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Kalle, >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:23:10PM +0530, Ganapathi Bhat wrote: >> > > From: Karthik Ananthapadmanabha <karthida@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > Driver will advertise RANDOM_MAC support only if the device supports >> > > this feature. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Karthik Ananthapadmanabha <karthida@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > I'd just like to point out that this is a very bad commit subject: >> > >> > "[PATCH] mwifiex: Random MAC address during scanning" >> > >> > It's borderline wrong, really. "Random MAC address during scanning" is >> > already supported. This patch is just adding a feature-flag check for >> > it, since some firmwares in the wild don't support it. A more accurate >> > description would be something like: >> > >> > "[PATCH] mwifiex: Add feature flag support for MAC randomization" >> > >> > The patch is already applied, so I'd only worry about it for future >> > submissions (no need to resend). Brian, thanks for pointing out that. I had missed it. >> I'm Really Sorry. I will take care of this in future. >> > The firmware which advertises this capability flag is yet to be shared > in upstream. The latest available firmware does not contain this flag. > So, is it possible to revert this change, so that we will resubmit > this (with proper subject) once our firmware is uploaded. Like Brian said, I don't think there's any point reverting it and resending the patch. Just something to learn for the future, for both of us. (I need to also check the titles more carefully.) -- Kalle Valo
