On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> In any case, your patch introduces a regression on systems. Please get
>> it reverted now, and then you can come up with a new approach to fix the
>> double enable of the upstream bridge.
>
> Who's sending in the revert? I can certainly do it if no one else does,
> but it needs to be done.
>
> I'm not seeing any patches coming out of Srinath to fix up the
> situation, so we should revert the broken patch until a better solution
> exists.
Hmm. I don't have the history here (apparently it never made lkml, for
example), so I don't even know which commit you're talking about.
>From some of the context it looks like commit 40f11adc7cd9 ("PCI:
Avoid race while enabling upstream bridges"), is that correct?
Linus
