Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> After the scheduled removal of MAC80211_RC_SIMPLE only >> MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_PID and MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_NONE are >> left as choices. >> >> Does MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_NONE have any userbase serious enough to >> justify all the constructs made for this case or could we simply >> always enable MAC80211_RC_PID? > > You can currently only get away living without it if you are just > using iwl3945 or iwl4965 as they provide their own rate control > algorithms. In the future if other vendor drivers are added with their > own rate control algorithm this list grows. Disabling PID will save > you some space only on some embedded platforms. Although currently its > not evident people would do this I do see this being a reasonable > option to keep around for later. I agree with Luis. There is a need for MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_NONE, please do not remove it. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
