On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 16:11 +0200, Benjamin Beichler wrote: > Since the radio index is already a valid NL attribute, this patch > simply > try to read it and create the radio specific to this index by the > previously used scheme. > > Since this allows to create radios out of row, we need to search for > a > free index for a new radio, when the index is not present as > parameter. This seems like a bad idea, what's the point? You can always change the MAC address later if you want. Also, you don't seem to actually do what you said, with the -1. johannes
