On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:23 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Hmm, not apart from agreeing with you that it would be better to not > drop everything when removing a VLAN. Not sure how often this > happens, though (and hence how big of a problem it is). What happens > in scenarios where hostapd is setup to automatically generate a bunch > of VLANs for every client, for instance? I'm not sure. However, I think it's less bad than one might guess since it really should only affect multicast frames, right? All unicast frames should go directly to the per-STA TXQ. Right now, with TXQ, encrypted VLANs are completely broken, so surely it's a step in the right direction? johannes