On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:02:18PM +0200, Antony Antony wrote: > hi, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:28:20AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Antony Antony <antony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt > > > @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ connects the device to the system. > > > > > > Required properties: > > > > > > - - compatible : Should be "brcm,bcm4329-fmac". > > > + - compatible : should be one of the following: > > > + * "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" > > > + * "brcm,bcm43430-fmac" > > > > You updated the bindings, but not the driver. So it's not actually > > going to work. More specifically, OOB interrupts won't work. > > > > understood, ignore this patch for now. Thanks Chen-Yu. > > > IIRC, The compatible string for this particular case, as it was > > originally proposed, only serves as a placeholder for the driver > > to check against. None of the instances in sunxi device trees > > match the actual chip model. Actual model matching is done > > through SDIO, as you've already seen. > > yes it seems SDIO driveer code is smarter, once it initialize > brcm,bcm4329-fmac it ignore the DT info and read the chip details to locate > firmware file. > > I also noticed other boards using bcm4329-fmac in similar situations. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9739181/ > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nanopi-k2.dts?h=v4.13-rc7 > > I will resend "NanoPi NEO Plus2" dts with "brcm,bcm4329-fmac" and see where > it goes. Adding the compatible or instead of? The former would be better. You should still have the actual chip in case you do have some difference to handle. Rob
