> Two points here. First, it looks like there is a problem here inherited > from the existing implementation. We go through payload, but in fact we > pass to cfg80211_inform_bss only the last QTN_TLV_ID_IE_SET element. > Second, it looks like QTN_TLV_ID_IE_SET here should be treated in > the same way as in qtnf_event_handle_sta_assoc, to avoid confusion. > In other words, either we use only QTN_TLV_ID_IE_SET in both cases, > or switch to specific qlink_tlv_ie_set elements. Ignore the second point: it is addressed by the next patch. Regards, Sergey
