This is a static checker fix. "cal_num" is 10. We're declaring the tx_dt[] and rx_td[] arrays as 3 element arrays. The static checker complains that we do: tx_dt[cal] = (vdf_y[1]>>20)-(vdf_y[0]>>20); "cal" is the iterator and it is in the 0-9 range so it looks like we could corrupt memory. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I'm pretty sure this patch is correct and absolutely harmless. But the code is pretty involved and I didn't test it. So you may want to review this one carefully. diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c index aa3ccc740521..176deb2b5386 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/phy.c @@ -3773,10 +3773,11 @@ static void _rtl8821ae_iqk_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path path) u32 tx_fail, rx_fail, delay_count, iqk_ready, cal_retry, cal = 0, temp_reg65; int tx_x = 0, tx_y = 0, rx_x = 0, rx_y = 0, tx_average = 0, rx_average = 0; int tx_x0[cal_num], tx_y0[cal_num], tx_x0_rxk[cal_num], - tx_y0_rxk[cal_num], rx_x0[cal_num], rx_y0[cal_num]; + tx_y0_rxk[cal_num], rx_x0[cal_num], rx_y0[cal_num], + tx_dt[cal_num], rx_dt[cal_num]; bool tx0iqkok = false, rx0iqkok = false; bool vdf_enable = false; - int i, k, vdf_y[3], vdf_x[3], tx_dt[3], rx_dt[3], + int i, k, vdf_y[3], vdf_x[3], ii, dx = 0, dy = 0, tx_finish = 0, rx_finish = 0; RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_IQK, DBG_LOUD,
