Unlikely to be a problem, but brcmf_sdiod_regrb() is
not symmetric with brcmf_sdiod_regrl() in this regard.
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index 6df12430a43f..9145dda11e5a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdiod_reg_read(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, u32 addr,
u8 brcmf_sdiod_regrb(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, u32 addr, int *ret)
{
- u8 data;
+ u8 data = 0;
int retval;
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "addr:0x%08x\n", addr);
--
2.11.0
