Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC v2 05/10] ath10k: htt: High latency TX support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2017-06-13 19:38, Peter Oh wrote:
On 06/12/2017 08:03 AM, Erik Stromdahl wrote:
Add HTT TX function for HL interfaces.
Intended for SDIO and USB.

Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@xxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index 48418f9..c5fd803 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -3572,7 +3572,10 @@ static int ath10k_mac_tx_submit(struct ath10k *ar,
      switch (txpath) {
      case ATH10K_MAC_TX_HTT:
-        ret = ath10k_htt_tx(htt, txmode, skb);
+        if (ar->is_high_latency)
Can we use function pointers at initial time to avoid condition check at hot path?
I'm afraid adding more lines on hot path.
I haven't made any comparison of assembly code between if-paths or function pointers,
but since most architectures have conditional instructions I don't think the
penalty is that big (if there is any penalty at all).
There are plenty of other condition checks in the RX path (mac80211 is full of them),
so I don't really see this as an issue.
That being said, any improvement is always welcome (even micro optimizations
if they are beneficial).
I will think about this and see if adding function pointers can be done in a nice way.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux