Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Kalle, > > 在 2017年06月13日 14:28, Kalle Valo 写道: >> Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> We have always met the unused log be printed as following. >>> >>> ... >>> [23193.523182] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: mwifiex_get_cfp: >>> cannot find cfp by band 2 & channel=13 freq=0 >>> [23378.633684] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: mwifiex_get_cfp: >>> cannot find cfp by band 2 & channel=13 freq=0 >>> >>> Maybe that's related to wifi regdom, since wifi default area >>> was US and didn't support 12~14 channels. >>> >>> As Frequencies: >>> * 2412 MHz [1] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2417 MHz [2] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2422 MHz [3] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2427 MHz [4] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2432 MHz [5] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2437 MHz [6] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2442 MHz [7] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2447 MHz [8] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2452 MHz [9] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2457 MHz [10] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2462 MHz [11] (30.0 dBm) >>> * 2467 MHz [12] (disabled) >>> * 2472 MHz [13] (disabled) >>> * 2484 MHz [14] (disabled) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfp.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfp.c >>> index 1ff2205..6e29943 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfp.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfp.c >>> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ mwifiex_get_cfp(struct mwifiex_private *priv, u8 band, u16 channel, u32 freq) >>> } >>> } >>> if (i == sband->n_channels) { >>> - mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, ERROR, >>> + mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, WARN, >>> "%s: cannot find cfp by band %d\t" >>> "& channel=%d freq=%d\n", >>> __func__, band, channel, freq); >> I don't see how this fixes anything, care to explain? And the title is >> quite vague. > > Sorry for the description maybe unclear. > I'm assuming the print log is expected for marvel wifi driver. Do we > should use 'WARN' to instead of the 'ERROR' here. But does that make any functional difference, isn't the warning still printed? -- Kalle Valo